Template talk:Item/testcases

Hey this is awesome! I just have one more request :p Would it be possible to include the implicit mods into the table row format along with a separator image? If yes, then would it also be possible to include an additional cosmetic mod with a separator above that as well. I ask this because of the new Demigod's Triumph. It has a cosmetic mod 'Has Golden Radiance' and I'm sure we'll see more cosmods on uniques in the future so it woukd he nice to include it in the table row format on the index page.--FaceLicker (talk) 20:48, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Glad ya like it ^^. I remember seeing somewhere that people didn't want implicit mods to be listed in the unique index pages. Though I'm not sure if this was referring to confusing them with explicit mods or entirely against implicit mods being on the list. I'm also not sure if implicit mods should have their own column or not, it would probably make the table too wide. -AnnanFay (talk) 22:23, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Originally, when I created the tables for the uniques I had purposely left out the implicit mods. My reasoning at the time was because it would indeed make the table too wide. there's already tons of info being displayed and we could do without another column. Also, implicit mods have nothing to do with unique items, they are solely dependent on the base item and people can look up that info elsewhere. Now, however, I think it would be a good idea to include all the mods in one column for display on the index page. Instead of forcing people to look up implicits in case they may have forgotten they can just view every mod on an item without having to leave the page. That's why im proposing the inclusion of implicit and cosmetic mods with separators into the existing mod column.--FaceLicker (talk) 23:43, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Ok, two things here. 1) Why is there a line for item type that says belt, helmet, etc. with a separator below it? 2)Somehow I managed to get the cosmetic mod to show up in the Template:NewItem/TableRow with a separator above it.. but the same code won't work for the implicit mod and I have no idea why. Any ideas?--FaceLicker (talk) 19:57, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * All the test cases should be working now. Though don't try adding an armour :P Or, do try so we have a test case which breaks. I've seemed to fix the row format as well. -AnnanFay (talk) 22:58, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Table Row formatting is or will be broken for Weapons, Shields, All other Armour, Maps, and Flasks. As GGG adds more unique items to the game, it will be increasingly important for us to have sortable tables on the index pages with as much relevant info as possible. People will be quite pissed if all they can see is Required Level and they're forced to visit every individual item page to compare different items.

Getting back to broken formatting.. Take a look at my work on the old Template:Item. You'll notice that the template includes every possible(at least at the time) stat and mod for every item type and rarity. That's basically the same route you're now taking with this template combo. The only problem is trying to keep everything viewing and functioning properly and I see you've already encountered the same problem that I did months ago with Required Level and Separator clause, heh. Now that I look back at it.. I did a pretty decent job :) You're a lot more experienced at this than I though so I'm sure you can iron out the kinks.--FaceLicker (talk) 16:00, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

I need your help, AnnanFay. I've successfuly managed to configure all the templates for maps and shields. How to get the separator to appear for armour types other than shields still eludes me though, but that doesn't really bother me. My real problem is Vaults of Atziri. Why do the MapLevel and HelpText lines not display? Vaults shows up just fine under the shorts section for the testcases. Why then does it not work on the item page? I just can't figure it out. I'd greatly appreciate your help on this. --FaceLicker (talk) 23:20, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Think I fixed both of those things. -AnnanFay (talk) 23:47, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I see that, Thanks! I can't believe I forgot all about the Template:NewItem/Default, haha. It's looking good now.--FaceLicker (talk) 23:52, 9 March 2013 (UTC)