Talk:List of unique swords

Just thinking, but would it make more sense to have this page presented exactly like the swords section on the Unique Items page? Just for the purpose of keeping layouts consistent across pages. Functionality like sortable tables are also really helpful, in my opinion. Iamacyborg (talk) 19:27, 11 February 2013 (UTC)


 * You said you liked the Arreat Summit format. So I made a rough draft with two different options utilizing the very same format but with a PoE flare. The current format on the Unique Items page is rather unpleasant to look at, it's bulky and intimidating. The current format was also intended simply for examples of each item with specific values. Now that people have started editing in Min-Max values, which I purposely refrained from doing, sort functionality is/will be screwed up a bit. I personally prefer either item format on this page compared to the Unique Items page. This format displays all the same information and thensome with room for more in a much tidier fashion. Ultimately, it doesn't matter a whole lot to me just so long as the information is provided.--FaceLicker (talk) 20:04, 11 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Ah, I meant to say that I like the Arreat Summit's way of categorising unique items. I think being able to sort through unique chest armour for the lowest requirements, or highest armour value can be really useful for people, so we should try to keep that functionality there. I completely agree that the current Unique Items page is bulky and intimidating, though some members have expressed that they'd still like to keep a page with the full listing. I think if we were to use the Unique Items page to explain what unique items are, we could then split everything down into pages like this one, and keep a full index page for the people who want one. Iamacyborg (talk) 20:15, 11 February 2013 (UTC)