Niightblade (talk | contribs) (→Level 8 xp wrong?: new section) |
Malice1574@legacy41644011 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I think the XP requirement for level 8 is wrong, can anyone verify this using '''in game data'''? (I suspect they have a bug with their website display of this and a few other gems.) --[[User:Nightblade|Nightblade]] ([[User talk:Nightblade|talk]]) 08:26, 20 February 2013 (UTC) |
I think the XP requirement for level 8 is wrong, can anyone verify this using '''in game data'''? (I suspect they have a bug with their website display of this and a few other gems.) --[[User:Nightblade|Nightblade]] ([[User talk:Nightblade|talk]]) 08:26, 20 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
| + | :I can't check it in game but it wouldn't be the first time that the xp progression on a gem has been a bit wacky. — [[User:Malice|Malice]] ([[User_talk:Malice|talk]]) 06:00, 21 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 06:00, 21 February 2013
Will shocks proliferate to already shocked enemies?
Shock can stack up to three times. If I shock two enemies at the same time that are near each other will the shocking proliferate to each other? So now each enemy has 2xshocking and takes +80% damage. -AnnanFay (talk) 18:16, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
- I believe the answer is yes. The same is true for the other status ailments, which are not limited to three at a time, although they other ones don't stack. Only the highest damage burning effect on a target does damage at any one time, and the slow from chill does not stack with itself. — Malice (talk) 02:35, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Level 8 xp wrong?
I think the XP requirement for level 8 is wrong, can anyone verify this using in game data? (I suspect they have a bug with their website display of this and a few other gems.) --Nightblade (talk) 08:26, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- I can't check it in game but it wouldn't be the first time that the xp progression on a gem has been a bit wacky. — Malice (talk) 06:00, 21 February 2013 (UTC)