No edit summary |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[User:Crimsonfalconer|Crimsonfalconer]] ([[User talk:Crimsonfalconer|talk]]) 08:08, 30 April 2017 (UTC) |
[[User:Crimsonfalconer|Crimsonfalconer]] ([[User talk:Crimsonfalconer|talk]]) 08:08, 30 April 2017 (UTC) |
||
: I say go ahead. Points and maybe links can be added to the {{tlx|Item}} at a later point with a bot perhaps. But keep in mind there might be some unreleased mtxes that will start to show. I agree that you should make a new template for it, similar to {{tlx|Query unique items}}. I think there are a few more pages besides this one that needs a overhaul, so having a template is better at that point and simplifies updating all the mtx tables tables in the future as well. --[[User:Illviljan|Illviljan]] ([[User talk:Illviljan|talk]]) 12:20, 30 April 2017 (UTC) |
: I say go ahead. Points and maybe links can be added to the {{tlx|Item}} at a later point with a bot perhaps. But keep in mind there might be some unreleased mtxes that will start to show. I agree that you should make a new template for it, similar to {{tlx|Query unique items}}. I think there are a few more pages besides this one that needs a overhaul, so having a template is better at that point and simplifies updating all the mtx tables tables in the future as well. --[[User:Illviljan|Illviljan]] ([[User talk:Illviljan|talk]]) 12:20, 30 April 2017 (UTC) |
||
| + | : We're supposed to get a new MTX system in 3.0, which might treat MTX in a wholly different way than items. If that's the case, we might not want to overload the item module/template with MTX stuff. I say go ahead with the SMW conversion though. —[[User:Vinifera7|Vini]] ([[User talk:Vinifera7|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Vinifera7|c]]) 15:15, 30 April 2017 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 15:15, 30 April 2017
SMW Tables
Would it be worth converting this page to SMW tables? Should we have a microtransaction query and template similar to skill gems (Template:SMW item table/skill gems)?
It loses quick access to the previews unless these can be easily added to the table somehow. It will however make the page easier to maintain, assuming we don't start hitting page processing timeouts.
Something like below?
{{SMW item table
|conditions=[[Has item class::Microtransactions]] [[Has cosmetic type::Helmet Skin]]
|description=1
|large=1
}}
Crimsonfalconer (talk) 08:08, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- I say go ahead. Points and maybe links can be added to the
{{Item}}at a later point with a bot perhaps. But keep in mind there might be some unreleased mtxes that will start to show. I agree that you should make a new template for it, similar to{{Query unique items}}. I think there are a few more pages besides this one that needs a overhaul, so having a template is better at that point and simplifies updating all the mtx tables tables in the future as well. --Illviljan (talk) 12:20, 30 April 2017 (UTC) - We're supposed to get a new MTX system in 3.0, which might treat MTX in a wholly different way than items. If that's the case, we might not want to overload the item module/template with MTX stuff. I say go ahead with the SMW conversion though. —Vini (t|c) 15:15, 30 April 2017 (UTC)